mirror of
https://github.com/PR0M3TH3AN/SeedPass.git
synced 2026-11-03 11:22:03 +00:00
thePR0M3TH3ANandClaude Fable 5
1eab3bf137
Python's `seedpass` launches its TUI when invoked with no subcommand. The port printed a help dump instead, which is why running the bare command looked broken: nothing was wrong with it, there was simply no way in. This adds the interactive mode that was missing. Scope is the daily path -- browse, search, copy, reveal, add a password / TOTP / key-value entry, archive, switch profile -- not a port of Python's v2 and v3 TUIs, which are around 20k lines of Textual between them. Piped or redirected, the bare command still prints the help: there is no terminal to drive. No new runtime dependencies. Node's tty and ANSI directly, rather than a TUI framework, because everything bundled here shares a process with unlocked seed phrases and the CLI's runtime surface is currently commander plus the noble/scure crypto libraries. The agent-blind rule from plan section 9.3 carries over intact, and matters more here than in the CLI because this screen renders the whole vault at once: list and detail views show metadata only, `c` copies without ever drawing the value, and `r` is the single explicit reveal -- on screen until the next keypress, then gone from the following frame. Everything is drawn on the alternate screen buffer, so a revealed secret cannot be recovered by scrolling back after quitting, and never lands in a terminal log that captures the main buffer. The key-value field is masked while being typed for the same reason. terminal.ts owes the user one thing above all: their shell back. Raw mode with a hidden cursor is an unusable terminal, so restoration is idempotent and wired to exit, SIGINT, SIGTERM, SIGHUP, and the uncaught-exception paths -- verified through a pty for each. Holding raw mode across the whole unlock sequence rather than toggling it per prompt also fixes a narrow leak: echo came back on between password attempts, so a password retyped after a typo was echoed in clear text. Tests drive the real screens through an injected terminal, including the redaction properties above. Two harness bugs worth recording, because both produced confident nonsense: sampling the frame count after dispatching a key made a synchronous redraw look like no redraw at all, and waiting only for "the screen stopped changing" returned during the second-long PBKDF2 a mutation performs, so the next keystroke landed on the previous screen and typed "q" into a form field instead of quitting. 122 CLI tests, 220 core tests, 36/36 cross-impl checks. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>