mirror of
https://github.com/PR0M3TH3AN/SeedPass.git
synced 2026-10-28 08:22:03 +00:00
Expanded the cross-implementation suite from 19 to 30 checks so every feature is exercised against the other implementation, not just the ones that were convenient: G edits (modify / archive / links) made by either side are seen by the other H deterministic conflict merge produces byte-identical output on both sides I an Argon2id-protected Python profile unlocks in TS J the encrypted config file interoperates both directions Entry coverage in phases A/B now spans every creatable kind, including a policy-constrained password and an imported (non-deterministic) TOTP. Two real bugs this surfaced, both fixed: - Password entries carrying a `policy` block derived the WRONG password in TS. Python's _generate_password_for_entry merges the entry's overrides onto the base policy before deriving; TS ignored the block entirely, so any entry created with policy flags produced a different password. core now exposes passwordPolicyFromRecord and the CLI applies it. - TS could not read a Python-written config file: Python wraps it in the kdf/ct JSON envelope (same class as the snapshot bug fixed last commit). loadConfig now parses the envelope; regression test included. One behavioral divergence found and deliberately NOT papered over: Python generates TOTP codes with pyotp defaults (6 digits / 30s) even when the entry records different values, so an imported 8-digit/45s secret yields different codes in each implementation -- and Python's would be rejected by the issuing service. The suite now reports it as a [DIVERGE] line rather than a pass or a failure, and the matrix records it as awaiting a product decision. TS behavior is believed correct. 173 core + 47 CLI tests green; 30/30 cross-implementation checks green with 2 documented divergences. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>