Reframe claims that a technically-literate critic could fairly challenge,
since a hosted service (BitUnlock, D1-backed) exists in the stack and relay
retention is best-effort:
- "No server of record" -> "No platform-owned source of truth" (state on
relays, not a platform database; no single operator controls it).
- Drop the impossibility claim "no one can ... delete your history" -> relay
retention is best-effort; keep your recovery export.
- "No platform to capture" -> "No lock-in" (fork any client, self-host any
service).
Accurate architectural claims are unchanged (keys never leave the browser,
Tessera never sees your key, ads cannot reach ranking, etc.).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BXQCvJPA6sVSQ5j8uBd9bB
A monochrome, architectural landing tying BitLogin/BitGate/BitFeed/BitUnlock/
Tessera into one message. Parent brand distinct from every product
(Alphabet-to-Google): the five product colours are the only chroma; monumental
condensed Ubuntu Sans display, mono annotation layer, theme-aware. Sections:
tenant->owner thesis, the five blocks, how they compose (Tessera as the worked
example), foundation principles, builders CTA. Static, no build, CSP-locked.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>
