Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
thePR0M3TH3AN 3220889f01 feat(nostr): NIP-32 labelling — the interop surface
BitGate read standard events but published a private vocabulary, making it an
island. NIP-32 (kind 1985) is the shared moderation vocabulary; BitGate now
reads and writes it. See ADR 0007.

The design keeps flexibility central, since the goal is a reusable building
block. A label is (namespace, value, target) and carries no built-in meaning —
"deny", "nsfw", and "MIT" are the same kind of object. What a label means is a
policy decision an application supplies via labelMapping { namespace,
denyValues, allowValues }. The codec itself is vocabulary-free; decodeLabels
returns every label regardless of namespace for generic use.

A matching label becomes a contribution authored by the labeller, gated
identically: it denies someone only if the labeller holds the capability in the
roster, exactly like a community source. An untrusted labeller's deny does
nothing, and labels fail closed without verification like any administrative
event.

- consume: ingestEvent maps kind 1985; loadLabels(labellers) fetches them
- emit: commands.publishLabel(target, value), gated by the same capability as
  denying, so the shared form is no weaker than the private one
- the widget bundle re-exports the label API for the drop-in path

Validated against 40 real kind:1985 events from public relays (ISO-639-1
language labels among them): all decoded with targets and namespaces, zero
throws. 897 tests; cold gates green; audit clean.
2026-08-10 10:01:34 -04:00
thePR0M3TH3AN adeba151b8 feat: rename to BitGate and close the drop-in gap
Renames the project and makes it as easy to adopt as BitLogin, which was the
stated bar and which it did not previously meet.

Rename (ADR 0005): @nostr-governance/* -> @bitgate/*, governance-* elements ->
bitgate-*, createGovernanceRuntime -> createBitGate. "Governance" reads as DAO
voting to this audience and named a category rather than a product; BitGate
names the benefit and joins the bit- family that BitVid and BitRoad compose
with. Domain types keep their names — the product is BitGate, the subject
matter is still governance. The migration plan is left as written; this ADR
records the change rather than rewriting history.

Drop-in distribution (ADR 0006): adopting BitGate meant supplying a transport,
authoring a policy, and wiring every element in JavaScript. Now:

- createRelayTransport(urls) — WebSocket transport with reconnection, backoff,
  subscription replay, and cross-relay dedupe
- policy presets (social, commerce, admin-only) addressable by name; the engine
  still carries no thresholds of its own
- <bitgate-provider> — configuration in markup, with descendants finding the
  runtime through a bubbling context event rather than DOM walking, which
  breaks across shadow boundaries
- npm run build:widget — a self-contained dist/bitgate.js

That last one came from running it in a browser rather than from a test. Bare
specifiers resolve in Node and vitest but not in a browser, so the widget
source worked everywhere except a plain static page — the one place it exists
to serve. The bundle is not committed: consumers build from reviewed source.

Also found by running it: the provider's ready event fires during element
upgrade, before a page that defines elements after parsing can attach a
listener, so it now exposes `ready` as a promise too.

Four bugs fixed along the way, three found by new tests and one by the browser:
admin state stayed silent when a roster change altered capabilities but no
denials; the relay transport sent every subscription twice on connect; the
commerce preset computed a meaningless visibility verdict at checkout and could
hide a listing from its own seller; <bitgate-status> threw on an unusable
decision.

759 tests; lint, typecheck, and both builds clean.
2026-08-09 19:58:45 -04:00
thePR0M3TH3AN 2beb7a7bb5 feat: adapter contract, commerce proof-of-fit, and reusability docs
Proves the engine did not stay video-specific during extraction.

- application adapter contract in core (createApplicationAdapter,
  evaluateObject, collectTargets): an object names the targets that govern it
  and the strictest verdict reaching any of them wins, so denying a seller
  takes their whole catalogue down with no cascade logic in the application
- examples/commerce: a marketplace on the public API covering all ten
  proof-of-fit behaviors the plan requires, including that no core change was
  needed. One product, one snapshot, four surfaces, four different verdicts.
- README, integration guide, per-example README, CHANGELOG, four ADRs, and
  GPL-3.0-or-later LICENSE (the license was listed in Phase 1 but missing)
- checkpoints rewritten to reflect actual state and to say plainly which
  migration-plan phases belong to the consumer repos rather than here

Fixes a real gap found by the proof-of-fit: composeDecisions kept only the
first decision's evidence, so an object governed by several targets lost the
evidence that drove its verdict. Evidence now merges — counts summed,
contributor lists unioned, flags or-ed.

556 tests; lint, typecheck, and per-package type build clean.
2026-08-09 17:57:09 -04:00