Closes the #11b un-quarantine work: the three target files now pass and run in
CI. A full-suite run with a per-file timeout then surfaced a FOURTH, pre-existing
hang that had never been in the map (dm-block-filter) — quarantined with a triage
note rather than left to hang CI.
user-blocks.test.mjs — post-completion HANG. The decrypt-timeout section installs
a never-resolving nip44Decrypt whose background decrypt-retry timer outlives the
run (manager.reset() races it). Added the repo's established bare-assert
`setTimeout(() => process.exit(0), 50)` exit after the final assertion.
nostr-publish-rejection.test.mjs — post-completion HANG (was NOT in the map, so it
had been silently hanging local `npm run test:unit`, which has no per-file timeout
unless UNIT_TEST_TIMEOUT_MS is set). All assertions pass, then the imported app
stack (app.js + subscriptions + userBlocks) keeps the loop alive. Same
`process.exit(0)`-after-cleanup fix. (The dev-mode + NIP-71 spec fixes were
already in the file.)
nwc-client.test.mjs — (1) mock shadow: readToolkitFromScope prefers the bootstrap's
frozen canonical toolkit over window.NostrTools, so per-section mocks never took
effect and real @noble rejected the fake keys. Remove the scope canonical so the
resolver falls through to each mock. (2) spec correction: one section expected a
rejection when the toolkit "lacks nip44", but mergeWithCanonical ALWAYS backfills
the canonical nip44 (even explicit `nip44:null`) — nip44_v2 is never absent. The
wallet now advertises a genuinely-unsupported scheme (nip44_v3) to exercise the
same UNSUPPORTED_ENCRYPTION path, and asserts error.code too. See TEST_INTEGRITY.md.
dm-block-filter.test.mjs — QUARANTINED (pre-existing, node:test). All subtests pass,
then it hangs: manager.loadBlocks() opens a live block-list subscription through
nostrClient's real SimplePool pointed at the test's fake relay URLs, leaking TCP
sockets + reconnect timers that node:test can't drain. Needs a node:test-safe fix
(inject a mock pool so no real socket opens) — a force process.exit in after() is
UNSAFE (verified: process.exitCode isn't set yet, so it masks failures).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
