Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
thePR0M3TH3ANandClaude Fable 5 a6b2996f4e zaps: foundation for the bitvid-native zap tally (#47) — schema + verify
First slice of docs/zap-tally-plan.md (decisions D1-D5 resolved in the doc):

- ZAP_TALLY_KIND = 30081 (addressable, d=payment_hash → one canonical event
  per real payment) + NOTE_TYPES.ZAP_TALLY schema + buildZapTallyEvent
  (nostrEventSchemas.js). Video + profile pointers.
- FEATURE_ZAP_TALLY flag (constants.js), default ON per D4.
- zapReceiptValidator.js: extractBolt11Fields (payment_hash + description_hash
  from the existing bech32 walker), verifyPaymentPreimage
  (sha256(preimage)==payment_hash), verifyBitvidZapTally — the security core:
  proves the invoice was paid AND bound to this zap request (description-hash
  binding blocks reusing a leaked preimage for another video). Amount is
  bolt11-derived, never the tag; pointers come from the embedded zap request.
- Schema-doc row for kind 30081.

Tests: tests/zap-tally-verify.test.mjs (8) — preimage check, bech32 field
round-trip, valid/bad-preimage/replay/zero-sats decisions, builder tag shape
(video + profile). Lint + build green.

No publishing or counting wired yet — next slices per the plan checklist.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>
2026-07-04 23:32:12 -04:00
thePR0M3TH3ANandClaude Opus 4.8 c5589a1514 zap: fix NWC connection, dialog UX, and receipt reporting/discovery
- NWC connection was fully broken: parseNwcUri passed a hex secret to
  nostr-tools getPublicKey (needs Uint8Array) and threw. Convert hex->bytes.
- A successful zap was shown as a red error when the kind-9735 receipt
  couldn't be validated. The NWC preimage already proves payment, so a
  paid-but-unconfirmed share is now a success-with-note, not a failure.
- Receipt discovery: query by the reliably-indexed #e/#a/#p tags instead of
  #bolt11 (which most relays don't index), and poll a few times since the
  receipt is published shortly after payment.
- In-flight "Sending..." status no longer mis-toned as a warning; success
  path fully resets the form; an in-flight-open click no longer cancels the
  open (which made the popover need many clicks); fee fallback verified
  no-bypass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
2026-06-23 14:53:38 -04:00
thePR0M3TH3ANandClaude Opus 4.8 0ec9db70e8 fix(zap): receipt validation works with nostr-tools 2.x SimplePool
After a successful split zap, validation errored: "Unable to initialize a relay
pool for receipt validation." The validator built a fresh `new SimplePool()` and
required `pool.list()`, but nostr-tools 2.x removed SimplePool.list() (the rest of
the app only has it because js/nostr/toolkit.js shims it). So validation always
failed even though the payment went through.

Fix: resolveReceiptListPool() applies the app's legacy .list shim
(shimLegacySimplePoolMethods) to the freshly created pool, and the gate now
accepts a listEvents override instead of hard-requiring pool.list.

tests/zap-receipt-pool.test.mjs: 2.x pool gets .list shimmed; createPool override
shimmed; listEvents override leaves the pool as-is; null when neither available.
Mutation-verified (removing the shim fails it).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
2026-06-21 22:11:46 -04:00
thePR0M3TH3AN 931fa1398f Bundle crypto helpers for zap validator 2025-10-29 16:20:41 -04:00
thePR0M3TH3AN 0724307202 Add zap receipt validation for zap receipts 2025-10-29 15:48:54 -04:00