Files
VoxVera/docs/roadmap.md
T
thePR0M3TH3ANandClaude Opus 4.8 9b03ada43a Flyers: edit, re-publish (keep-alive), and delete (tombstone + NIP-09)
Authors can now manage a published flyer from the editor when it's loaded from
an event (author-only — the active signing key must match the flyer's author):

- Edit: change fields and publish again; the same d-tag replaces in place.
- Re-publish (keep-alive): re-sign + re-broadcast the current content so relays
  that prune app-data don't age the flyer out. Partially addresses roadmap #4.
- Delete: belt-and-suspenders across relay behaviors —
  1) a replaceable TOMBSTONE (same kind+d, payload deleted:true + a ["deleted"]
     tag) that overwrites the flyer's content, so the board/viewer hide it even
     on relays that ignore deletions, and
  2) a NIP-09 deletion request (kind 5) for the addressable a-tag + event id.
  Confirmed via a modal; framed as best-effort, not a guarantee.

Tombstone recognition: the board's parseFlyers keeps the newest event per
(pubkey, d) and skips it when that newest version is a tombstone (so a delete
can't be reversed by an older copy arriving later); the viewer renders a
localized "This flyer was removed." state.

Adds the loaded-flyer actions UI + a delete-confirm modal, 11 new strings ×
14 languages, a Python schema test for the tombstone payload, and e2e for the
delete flow, board hiding, and the viewer removed state. 216 e2e across all six
engines; docs (spec/roadmap/README) updated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
2026-06-10 19:39:23 -04:00

265 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# VoxVera Roadmap & Known Issues
This document captures known limitations and the development directions that
would address them. None of these are code bugs — they are product- and
threat-model-level gaps in the current static Nostr client. They are listed
roughly in priority order: the trust model (#1–#2) is the highest-leverage area
because almost every other risk flows from it being undefined.
Status legend: **Open** (not started) · **Partial** (some mitigation exists) ·
**Planned** (committed direction) · **In progress** (partially shipped).
## Shipped so far (2026-06-10)
The trust model (#1–#2) has moved from undefined to implemented:
- **Bulletin board login gate** — viewing the board requires a connected Nostr
identity (NIP-07 extension, a pasted `nsec`, or a generated key).
- **Web-of-trust filter** — the board defaults to flyers from authors in the
viewer's NIP-02 follow graph, seeded from a curator account for fresh keys,
with a "Show all" opt-out (so it is no longer an unmoderated firehose).
- **Editor publishing identity** — authors can publish anonymously (default),
via NIP-07, or with an imported `nsec` that is optionally PIN-encrypted at
rest (PBKDF2 → AES-GCM; plaintext never stored).
- **Flyer management (edit / re-publish / delete)** — an author can edit a
loaded flyer (re-publish replaces in place via the `d` tag), re-publish as a
keep-alive, or delete it. Delete is belt-and-suspenders: a replaceable
**tombstone** (so the board/viewer hide it even on relays that ignore NIP-09)
plus a **NIP-09** deletion request. Best-effort, author-only.
All of the above is localized across the 14 languages and covered by the
cross-engine Playwright suite. **What remains** on #1–#2 is polish (degree-2
trust, blocklist/report, NIP-05 badges, an identified-vs-anonymous display) plus
the editor follow-ups noted under the *Planned direction* section. **#3–#5 are
still fully open** — distribution centralization (#3) is now the
highest-leverage untouched item.
---
## 1. Bulletin board has no moderation or abuse story — **In progress**
> Direction agreed and **Phases 1–2 shipped**: the board requires a connected
> Nostr identity to view, and it now filters to flyers from the viewer's NIP-02
> web of trust (with a bootstrap seed for new keys). See *Planned direction:
> identity + web-of-trust on the board* below (jointly addresses #1 and #2).
> Remaining: degree-2 trust, blocklist/report, NIP-05 badges (Phase 3).
**Problem.** `board.html` lists every Nostr event tagged `t=voxvera` / `t=flyer`
from the public default relays, with no filtering, verification, or moderation.
Anyone can publish a kind-`30078` event with those tags and immediately appear
on the board — including spam, hostile titles, or links to harmful content, all
under VoxVera's branding.
**Current mitigation (Partial on safety, not abuse).** Relay content is treated
as untrusted: titles and npubs are HTML-escaped, and link URLs are rejected
unless `http(s)` (so `javascript:`/`data:` never render). This prevents script
injection but does nothing about spam or unwanted-but-valid content.
**Why it matters.** A static client cannot rate-limit or moderate server-side,
so the board is trivially gameable the moment it is used adversarially. This is
the single biggest liability for promoting the board publicly.
**Possible directions.**
- Client-side curation: an allowlist of npubs (a "follows"/featured set) so the
default view shows only vetted authors.
- A local, user-controlled blocklist / "hide this" with `localStorage`
persistence (per-device, no server needed).
- A dedicated VoxVera relay (or relay set) that applies its own admission
policy, with the public relays as fallback.
- A "report" affordance that records to a relay/list a curator can act on.
- Make the unfiltered firehose an explicit opt-in mode, not the default.
Depends on **#2** (without identity, allowlists/blocklists are weak).
## 2. Anonymous keys give no authenticity or accountability — **In progress**
> Phases 1–2 shipped: the board viewer connects a real Nostr identity (NIP-07)
> and the board is filtered by that viewer's web of trust (with a curator seed
> for new keys), so spam from unknown authors is hidden by default. The **editor
> now lets authors publish under their own identity too** — NIP-07, an imported
> `nsec` (optionally PIN-encrypted at rest), or stay anonymous (default) — so a
> flyer can carry a stable, identifiable author when the creator wants one.
> Authenticity *display* on the board (NIP-05 badges, an identified/anonymous
> distinction) remains ahead.
**Problem.** The client generates a fresh anonymous key per browser, so the
board's "Posted by" npub is effectively random and there is no way to verify a
flyer came from who it claims. The trust model is currently empty.
**Why it matters.** Authenticity underpins the board, "report"/blocklist
features, and any notion of a trusted author. Without stable identity, #1 has no
foundation to build on.
**Possible directions.**
- Optional persistent identity: let a user keep/reuse a key (or import one) and
associate it with their flyers, while keeping anonymous-by-default.
- First-class NIP-07 support for users who already have a Nostr identity.
- Optional NIP-05 / verified handle display on the board.
- A clear UI distinction between "anonymous" and "identified" flyers.
The npub column on the board was built deliberately forward-looking so this
maps in cleanly.
## Planned direction: identity + web-of-trust on the board
Jointly addresses #1 and #2. The goal is to make the board accountable without
abandoning anonymous-by-default authoring.
**Key reality that shapes the design.** You cannot gate *writing* to public
relays — anyone can publish a `t=voxvera` event directly, never touching this
client. So a "login required to post" button is only a soft deterrent; it can't
bound what is on the board. The real lever is **filtering what the board
displays**. Login's actual job is to supply the *viewer's* identity so the
board can show them flyers from people they trust.
**Principles.**
- **Login enables a trust-filtered view; it is not access control.** The data
is public on relays regardless, so hiding it in the UI is cosmetic. Treat
login as "we know who you are, so we can show you a trustworthy board."
- **Keep anonymous creation + printing fully available.** The core authoring
tool must not require a persistent, linkable identity (activist threat model).
Identity is required only to *appear on the public board*, not to make/print a
flyer.
- **Web-of-trust is the actual spam defense, not login.** NIP-07 keys are free
and unlimited, so "must have a key" alone just makes a spammer generate one.
Filtering by the viewer's NIP-02 follow graph (degree 1, optionally
follows-of-follows) is what raises the cost.
- **Don't lock out mobile.** NIP-07 (`window.nostr`) needs a desktop extension,
but scanned-QR flyers open on phones. "Login" should support NIP-07 **plus**
nsec import (with warnings) and/or NIP-46 remote signer, and/or promoting the
existing anonymous key to a kept identity.
**Phased plan.**
- **Phase 1 — Identity. ✅ Shipped.** The board (`board.html` / `board.js`) shows
a login gate instead of the table until the viewer connects. Three methods: a
NIP-07 extension (`window.nostr.getPublicKey()`), pasting an `nsec`, or creating
a new key (see decision 2 below). On success it reveals the table, surfaces the
connected npub with a Disconnect control, and remembers the pubkey in
`localStorage` (`voxvera_connected_pubkey`) so a return visit reconnects from
the pubkey alone — no prompt or re-entry, regardless of method. Anonymous
create/print is untouched — connecting is required only to *view the board*.
- **Phase 2 — Web-of-trust filter. ✅ Shipped.** On connect the board fetches
the viewer's NIP-02 contact list (kind 3) and defaults to flyers from authors
in their follow graph (degree 1) plus themselves, with a **"Show all"**
opt-out. **Bootstrap seed:** a viewer with no follow list of their own (a
fresh key) is seeded from a pinned curator account's follows
(`FALLBACK_CURATOR_PUBKEY` in `board.js` =
`npub15jnttpymeytm80hatjqcvhhqhzrhx6gxp8pq0wn93rhnu8s9h9dsha32lx`), so a brand-
new viewer still gets a curated board instead of the unmoderated firehose. If
no trust data can be fetched at all, the board falls back to showing
everything (never mysteriously empty). Covered by the cross-engine e2e suite
(followed-only view + show-all opt-out; curator-seeded fallback).
- **Phase 3 — Optional / next.** Degree-2 trust (follows-of-follows), a local
blocklist / "hide this", report-to-list, and NIP-05 verified badges. Also:
the bootstrap curator is currently a single hardcoded pubkey — consider making
it configurable or a small curated set.
**Decisions made (2026-06-10).**
1. **Board viewing: login-required.** The board is blank (a Connect prompt)
until a Nostr identity is connected — framed as a members' space rather than a
public discovery surface.
2. **Login methods: NIP-07 + nsec import + key generation. ✅ Shipped.** The gate
offers three ways in: a NIP-07 browser extension, pasting a private key
(`nsec`), or creating a new key. The nsec is decoded **in-page** to derive the
pubkey and then discarded — only the pubkey is persisted, since the board only
reads (never signs). "Create a new key" reuses this device's existing
anonymous key if present (so it doesn't orphan an editor identity) or
generates one, and reveals the `nsec` with a "save this — we can't recover it"
warning before continuing. This **resolves the earlier mobile-lockout
trade-off**: a phone visitor with no extension can now generate or paste a key
to view the board. Covered by the cross-engine e2e suite (nsec import +
pubkey-only persistence + reload restore; invalid nsec; key generation +
reveal + connect).
**Follow-ups this opens.**
- **In-page nsec handling.** Pasting a secret key into a web page is inherently
riskier than a NIP-07 extension that keeps the key isolated; the input is a
password field, the value is cleared after use, and nothing is transmitted, but
a NIP-46 remote signer would be a safer mobile path to add later.
- **Editor identity (shipped).** The editor now signs under anon / NIP-07 /
imported nsec. A remembered nsec is PIN-encrypted at rest (PBKDF2 600k →
AES-GCM); plaintext is never stored. **Known weakness:** a short numeric PIN is
brute-forceable offline if the encrypted blob leaks — it guards casual snooping,
not a targeted attacker. Next: NIP-46 remote signer; an attempt-limit / lockout
on repeated wrong PINs; and optionally encrypting the anonymous device key the
same way (today it is stored in plaintext, as before).
- **Editor vs board identity are independent.** The editor's publishing identity
and the board's viewing identity are stored separately and don't yet sync; a
future pass could share one connected identity across both pages.
## 3. Client distribution is centralized (a single chokepoint) — **Open**
**Problem.** The content lives on decentralized relays, but the *client* is one
domain (`voxvera.org`) on a centralized host (Vercel). A censor can block the
domain and most users are stuck, which undercuts the censorship-resistance
premise even though the backend is robust.
**Current mitigation (Partial).** The client is fully static and host-agnostic,
so it *can* be served from any static host or mirror — but discovery and trust
of mirrors is unsolved, so in practice users depend on the canonical domain.
**Possible directions.**
- Document and support official mirrors (IPFS/IPNS, other static hosts) with a
verifiable build (subresource integrity / reproducible hash).
- A one-file/offline build users can save and reopen (`file://`) — verify
WebCrypto/clipboard degrade gracefully off a secure context.
- Revisit the dropped Tor/onion distribution path as an *optional* mirror (kept
off `main` per current guardrails, but a documented option).
- Publish the client itself to a content-addressed network so the front door is
not a single DNS name.
## 4. Relay permanence is overstated — **Partial**
> Partial mitigation shipped: the editor now has a **Re-publish (keep-alive)**
> action, so an author can refresh a flyer before relays age it out. The durable
> fix (a pinned/dedicated relay) is still open.
**Problem.** The app depends on a few general-purpose relays
(`relay.damus.io`, `nos.lol`, `relay.primal.net`) that can prune app-data kinds,
rate-limit, or drop events. "Your flyer is still there later" is therefore not
guaranteed. The single relay hint in the `naddr` also reduces fetch robustness
for events not on the default set.
**Possible directions.**
- Run/pin a dedicated VoxVera relay (or several) so published flyers have a
durable home, with the public relays as redundancy.
- Let authors configure and embed their own preferred relays.
- Consider a re-broadcast / "keep alive" helper for important flyers.
- Reconsider how many relay hints to embed in the poster `naddr` (tradeoff:
URL length / QR density vs. fetch robustness — see the QR Target notes in the
spec).
## 5. Content-safety guardrails are minimal — **Open**
**Problem.** Beyond HTML-escaping and URL-scheme rejection, there is nothing
preventing the tool (and especially the public board) from being used to author
or surface illegal/harmful content carrying VoxVera's branding.
**Possible directions.** Tie this to #1/#2: curation, reporting, and a clear
terms/acceptable-use stance for any hosted board. A purely local authoring tool
has a smaller surface than a public discovery board, so scope decisions here
should follow the board's trust model.
---
## Smaller / lower-priority items
- **Field-fit is layout-measured, not a fixed cap.** Robust, but capacity
varies with font availability and zoom; the
[cheat sheet](flyer-field-limits.md) is explicitly approximate. Fine as-is;
noted so it is not mistaken for a contract.
- **Favicon — ✅ done.** A small inline SVG (`site/favicon.svg`) is linked from
both pages, so browsers no longer request (and 404 on) `/favicon.ico`.
- **WebKit/Safari coverage in CI** needs `libavif16` on Linux runners
(`sudo npx playwright install-deps`); headless WebKit is also not a perfect
stand-in for real Safari/iOS print + clipboard behavior, so a real-device
pass before releases is still worth it.
---
*Reviewed 2026-06-10. The trust model (#1–#2) is now implemented — see "Shipped
so far" above. The highest-leverage untouched item is now #3 (the client is a
single centralized domain), since it most undercuts the censorship-resistance
premise even with the backend on decentralized relays.*